@article{oai:tohoku-mpu.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000591,
 author = {渡部, 俊彦 and Watanabe, Toshihiko and 古澤, 忍 and Furusawa, Shinobu and 川村, 俊介 and Kawamura, Shunsuke and 佐藤, 厚子 and Sato, Atsuko and 八百板, 康範 and Yaoita, Yasunori and 諸根, 美恵子 and Morone, Mieko and 奥山, 祐子 and Okuyama, Yuko and 町田, 浩一 and Machida, Koichi and 米澤, 章彦 and Yonezawa, Akihiko},
 issue = {61},
 journal = {東北薬科大学研究誌, Journal of Tohoku Pharmaceutical University},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {We devised the evaluation method of lecture contents to improve quality of the education. We gave a test about the lecture contents before and after this lecture, and calculated the frequency of the teacher s misunderstanding from the difference of the results. We determined that there was an education effect in the student whom the results of the post-test had better than pretest. in addition, we determined that there was no education effect in the student whom the results of the post-test had worse than pretest. The ratio of student who was not recognized of the education effect was assumed as a teacher s misunderstanding rate. The lecture contents were classified in three phases by a degree of difficulty, and the incidence of teacher s misunderstanding rate was compared with the average of the pre-post-test. in this investigation, an immunology outline was chosen as an object of survey. The pretest average of the remembrance（easy）level was 45.0±23.6, average 85.9±2.2 of the post-test, teacher s misunderstanding incidence 4.7±4.4. The pretest average of the interpretation（usually）level was 36.9±18.1, average 55.2±20.3 of the post-test, teacher s misunderstanding incidence 51.0±18.7. The pretest average of the solution to the problem（difficult）level was 29.5±22.1, average 62.2±23.6 of post-test, teacher s misunderstanding incidence 36.0±26.6. as a result of investigation using a pre-post-test, we were able to digitize the frequency of the teacher s misunderstanding and evaluate a degree of difficulty of the education objectively.},
 pages = {55--63},
 title = {教授錯覚発生率の調査と講義内容の評価},
 year = {2014},
 yomi = {ワタナベ, トシヒコ and フルサワ, シノブ and カワムラ, シュンスケ and サトウ, アツコ and ヤオイタ, ヤスノリ and モロネ, ミエコ and オクヤマ, ユウコ and マチダ, コウイチ and ヨネザワ, アキヒコ}
}